Union-State Relations – NDA Polity Notes

India stretches from the snowy peaks of Kashmir to the tropical shores of Kerala, from the deserts of Rajasthan to the forests of the Northeast. With twenty-eight States and eight Union Territories, 1.4 billion people, hundreds of languages, and centuries of regional histories, no single central authority could effectively govern every local matter from New Delhi.

At the same time, a country that fragments into dozens of independent mini-states cannot defend its borders, regulate its economy, or speak with one voice in international affairs. India needs both: a strong national government for matters that concern the entire country, and empowered State governments for matters that vary by region and require local knowledge.

This is the constitutional rationale for federalism: dividing governmental powers between the Union and the States so that each level governs within its sphere, and together they govern the entire country effectively. The Constitution of India achieves this through Part XI (Articles 245–263) on Union-State legislative and administrative relations, Part XII (Articles 264–293) on financial relations, and the Seventh Schedule containing the three legislative lists.

For NDA, this chapter was tested in six questions between 2009 and 2014, and has not appeared in the available PYQ set since. The ten-year absence makes every untested aspect of this chapter a high-probability future topic. The chapter rewards systematic learning rather than selective coverage.

Part 1: Indian Federalism: What Kind of Federal System Does India Follow?

What is federalism? Federalism is the constitutional principle of dividing governmental powers between two levels of government, a national government and regional governments, each sovereign within its own sphere and each deriving authority directly from the Constitution. Neither level can abolish or override the other within its constitutional domain.

India chose a federal structure but not classical federalism. India’s system is best described as “a quasi-federal state with a unitary bias”: it has federal features (division of powers, written Constitution, independent judiciary) but also significant unitary features (residuary powers in Parliament, single citizenship, Governor appointed by President, emergency provisions allowing Centre to govern States).

Article 1: “Union of States”

The Constitution’s choice of words is deliberate. Article 1 describes India not as a *federation* but as a “Union of States.” The Constituent Assembly used “Union” rather than “federation” to signal that the Indian Union is *indestructible*: States can be reorganised, renamed, or divided, but the Union cannot be broken up. No State has the right to secede from the Indian Union.

Exam Recall Article/Schedule: Article 1; Seventh Schedule; Articles 245–263 Theme: Indian Federalism: Character and Foundation Key Facts: India = “Union of States” (not federation) | Article 1 | Quasi-federal with unitary bias | Three legislative lists in Seventh Schedule | PYQ span: 2009–2014 (ten-year gap after 2014) NDA Trap: India is NOT a classical federal state. The choice of “Union of States” (not “federation”) in Article 1 reflects the indestructibility of the Union.

Part 2: Distribution of Legislative Powers: The Three Lists

How does the Constitution divide law-making powers? A federal Constitution must specify who makes which laws. If this is left vague, both Union and States will claim power over the same subject: and the resulting conflicts will paralyse governance. India’s Constituent Assembly solved this through a three-list system contained in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Three lists, not two and not four, with Parliament legislating on List I, State Legislatures on List II, and both on List III.

Constitutional Logic of the Three Lists

List	Name	Who Legislates	Constitutional Purpose	Conflict Rule
List I (Union List)	Union List	Parliament exclusively	Subjects of national importance requiring uniform law across India: defence, banking, foreign policy, railways, taxation	No conflict possible: Parliament exclusive; on conflict with State law on Concurrent, Union law prevails
List II (State List)	State List	State Legislatures exclusively (in normal times)	Subjects of regional importance where local governance is more appropriate: police, agriculture, public health	In exceptional circumstances, Parliament can legislate (see Part 7); State law prevails within State territory when no central law exists
List III (Concurrent List)	Concurrent List	Both Parliament AND State Legislatures	Subjects where both national and local legislation is needed: education, marriage, criminal law, forests	If conflict between Union and State law on same subject, Union law prevails over State law to extent of repugnancy
(No fourth list)	NO “Residuary List”	Parliament: Article 248	Unlisted subjects automatically fall to Parliament; no named “Residuary List” exists	Parliament legislates on all subjects not in State List or Concurrent List

★ IMPORTANT  NDA 2011-II tested “Residuary List: Education” as an incorrectly matched pair. Double error: (1) “Residuary List” does NOT exist as a named constitutional list; (2) Education is in the CONCURRENT List (not residuary). Know this double correction.

Three Legislative Lists: Master Subject Table

This is the chapter’s anchor revision tool. Every NDA-tested subject and the most commonly examined subjects appear here.

Subject	List	Entry	Constitutional Rationale	NDA Relevance
Defence of India; Military forces	Union List (I)	1	National security requires single command	Cross-chapter: P7, P8, P13
Foreign Affairs; Diplomatic relations	Union List (I)	10	India must speak with one voice internationally	Core Union function
Banking, insurance, stock exchanges	Union List (I)	45	Financial system uniformity requires central regulation: businesses operate across State borders	NDA 2011-II: Banking = Union List
Railways; Highways (national)	Union List (I)	22	Infrastructure of national integration: national network needs national regulation	Cross-chapter: P7
Income Tax (non-agricultural)	Union List (I)	82	Major central revenue; distributed to States via Finance Commission	NDA 2009-II: Income tax = Union
Corporation Tax	Union List (I)	85	Corporate taxation must be uniform nationally for business investment	NDA 2009-II: Corporation tax = Union
Customs Duty (imports/exports)	Union List (I)	83	International trade = Union function; States cannot levy import duties	NDA 2009-II: Customs duty = Union
Citizenship; Naturalization	Union List (I)	17	Single citizenship requires single citizenship authority	India has only one citizenship
Public Health and Sanitation; Hospitals	State List (II)	6	Local conditions vary enormously: State governments closer to healthcare needs	NDA 2009-I: Public Health = State List
Agriculture; Land rights	State List (II)	14	Regional farming patterns, land tenure systems: best governed locally	NDA 2011-II: Agriculture = State List
Police; Public Order; Prisons	State List (II)	1, 2	Law and order is primarily a local concern: State police know local conditions	Cross-chapter: P9
Sales Tax (intra-State goods)	State List (II)	54	Major State revenue; varied rates appropriate across States (substantially replaced by GST)	NDA 2009-II: Sales tax = State
Agricultural Income Tax	State List (II)	46	Agricultural income distinct from corporate/salary income; State primary regulator of agriculture	Contrast with income tax (Union)
Land Revenue	State List (II)	45	Land is a State subject; revenue from land belongs to States	State fiscal resource
Marriage and Divorce; Succession	Concurrent List (III)	5	Personal law varies by religion and region; both Union and States have legitimate interest	NDA 2011-II: Marriage = Concurrent
Education (including Universities)	Concurrent List (III)	25	Moved from State List to Concurrent by 42nd Amendment (1976): national standards needed while retaining State flexibility	NDA 2011-II: Education = Concurrent (NOT State; NOT residuary)
Forests	Concurrent List (III)	17A	Moved from State List to Concurrent by 42nd Amendment (1976): environmental protection needs national framework	Cross-reference: P3, P5, P6 (42nd Amendment)
Criminal Law and Procedure (IPC, CrPC)	Concurrent List (III)	1, 2	Core legal framework must be uniform nationally; States can also legislate	Cross-chapter: Judiciary (P10)
Environmental Protection	Concurrent List (III)	17B	Added by 42nd Amendment; environmental challenges cross State boundaries	Cross-reference: P5 (DPSP)
Residuary Subjects (unlisted)	NOT a separate list: Parliament (Article 248)	—	Parliament legislates on ALL matters not in State List or Concurrent List: no fourth list exists	NDA 2010-I | 2011-II

★ IMPORTANT  Four of the six NDA PYQs for this chapter test specific list placements. Know: Public Health = State; Banking = Union; Agriculture = State; Marriage = Concurrent; Education = Concurrent (NOT State; NOT residuary). These five subjects are the chapter’s highest-priority exam facts.

42nd Constitutional Amendment: The Transfer of Education and Forests

Before 1976, Education and Forests were exclusively State subjects. The 42nd Constitutional Amendment (1976) transferred both to the Concurrent List. The rationale: Education requires national minimum standards: a degree from one State university should be recognised across India; curriculum quality should meet national benchmarks, while States retain the primary role in funding and running schools and colleges. Forests require national environmental oversight because deforestation in one State affects rivers, biodiversity, and climate across multiple States.

The 42nd Amendment is the single most consequential amendment for this chapter. It also amended the Preamble (inserting “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity”), added three DPSPs (Articles 39A, 43A, 48A), and created Part IV-A with Fundamental Duties: making it a cross-chapter constitutional landmark studied in P3, P5, and P6 as well.

Part 3: Residuary Powers: Parliament’s Constitutional Reserve

What happens when an entirely new subject appears? In 1950, no constitution-drafter could anticipate cyberspace, satellite communication, space technology, or artificial intelligence. These subjects did not exist as recognisable policy domains. When they emerged, who would make the laws?

The constitutional answer is Article 248: the residuary power. Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any matter not enumerated in the Concurrent List or the State List. Any subject not listed anywhere automatically belongs to Parliament. The Constitution calls this residuary legislative power, not a residuary *list*, because unlisted subjects are by definition not listed.

There is NO “Residuary List.” There are exactly THREE lists: Union (I), State (II), Concurrent (III). No fourth list exists. Residuary subjects are UNLISTED by definition. Residuary powers vest in Parliament via Article 248: not in any named list.  [NDA 2011-II: “Residuary List: Education” tested as the INCORRECTLY matched pair: wrong on both counts]

India vs USA: The Residuary Powers Reversal

Dimension	India (Article 248)	United States (10th Amendment)
Where residuary powers vest	Parliament: exclusive legislative power over unlisted subjects	States: powers not delegated to federal government are reserved to States or people
Constitutional logic	Strong Centre: Constituent Assembly feared fragmentation; preferred national unity	Strong States: American founders feared federal tyranny; preferred State sovereignty
Effect on federalism	Unitary bias: Parliament can legislate on ANY new subject; States cannot claim unlisted subjects	Classic federal balance: States have broader residual authority
Educational note	Students applying US federal theory to India will answer residuary powers questions incorrectly	USA and India have opposite approaches to the same constitutional problem

★ IMPORTANT  “USA: States hold the rest. India: Parliament holds the rest.” This single sentence captures the constitutional reversal. The India-USA contrast makes Article 248 memorable because it is counterintuitive to students familiar with classical federal theory.  [NDA 2010-I | 2011-II]

Part 4: NDA Subject Placements: Every Tested Subject Explained

Each NDA-tested subject has a constitutional rationale. Understanding WHY it belongs to its list prevents misclassification.

Public Health and Sanitation: State List (Entry 6) [NDA 2009-I]

WHY State List? Public health needs vary enormously across India. A monsoon-prone State faces different water-borne disease challenges than a drought-affected State. Different regions have different disease burdens, hospital infrastructure, and sanitation requirements. State governments, being closer to local populations, are better positioned to regulate hospitals, dispensaries, clinics, sanitation measures, and preventive health programmes. Public Health is therefore Entry 6 of the State List (List II) Public Health is neither Union List nor Concurrent List. [NDA 2009-I]

NDA 2009-I offered Union List and Concurrent List as distractors. Public Health is neither: it is State List.

Banking: Union List (Entry 45) [NDA 2011-II]

WHY Union List? Banks operate across State borders. A bank headquartered in Maharashtra has branches in Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, and West Bengal. If each State could regulate banking independently, the regulatory framework would fragment: different States could allow different deposit insurance standards, different lending rules, and different corporate governance requirements for the same bank. Banking regulation requires national uniformity: hence Entry 45 of the Union List (List I). [NDA 2011-II]

Agriculture: State List (Entry 14) [NDA 2011-II]

WHY State List? Agricultural practices, cropping patterns, land tenure systems, irrigation, and farmer welfare vary enormously across India’s diverse climatic zones. Rice cultivation in the Cauvery delta has different regulatory needs from wheat farming in Punjab or tea estates in Assam. State governments are better positioned to understand and regulate these regional variations. Agriculture, including land relations and farming practices, is Entry 14 of the State List (List II). [NDA 2011-II]

Marriage and Divorce: Concurrent List (Entry 5) [NDA 2011-II]

WHY Concurrent List? Marriage in India is governed by personal laws that vary by religion: Hindu marriage law, Muslim marriage law, Christian marriage law, and others. This requires both national standards (protecting fundamental rights such as the minimum age of marriage) and the ability of Parliament to legislate uniformly (as it did through the Special Marriage Act) while States retain power to legislate in this area too. Marriage and Divorce is Entry 5 of the Concurrent List (List III): the placement explains why there is ongoing debate about a Uniform Civil Code (which would use Parliament’s power over a Concurrent subject to create one national marriage law). [NDA 2011-II]

Education: Concurrent List (Entry 25) [NDA 2011-II]

WHY Concurrent List? Before 1976, Education was a State subject. The 42nd Constitutional Amendment (1976) transferred it to the Concurrent List (Entry 25, List III). Parliament now has power to legislate on Education: which it exercised through the Right to Education Act (2009): while States also retain legislative power.

The NDA 2011-II question presented “Residuary List: Education” as one of four paired options and asked which was incorrectly matched. This option contains two simultaneous errors: (1) there is no list called “Residuary List” in the Indian Constitution: only Union, State, and Concurrent Lists; and (2) Education is not a residuary subject: it is explicitly listed in the Concurrent List (Entry 25). This double-error needs to be corrected separately and clearly. [NDA 2011-II]

Exam Recall Article/Schedule: Seventh Schedule: Entries 6, 14, 45, 5, 25, 17A Theme: NDA Subject Placements: All Six Confirmed Subjects Key Facts: Public Health = State (Entry 6) | Banking = Union (Entry 45) | Agriculture = State (Entry 14) | Marriage = Concurrent (Entry 5) | Education = Concurrent (Entry 25): moved from State List by 42nd Amendment 1976 | Forests = Concurrent (Entry 17A): moved from State List by 42nd Amendment 1976 NDA Trap: NDA 2009-I: Public Health = State List (not Union, not Concurrent). NDA 2011-II: “Residuary List: Education” = DOUBLE ERROR: no Residuary List exists + Education is Concurrent.

Part 5: Taxation Powers: Union, State, and GST

Why do both the Union and the States need separate taxation powers? Each level of government needs its own revenue to function independently. If States depended entirely on the Union for all their money, they would not be functionally autonomous. The Constitution therefore gives each level independent taxation powers, while recognising that some taxes must be levied nationally.

Tax	Legislative Competence	Constitutional Basis	NDA Tested
Income Tax (non-agricultural income)	UNION: exclusive	Entry 82, Union List (List I)	NDA 2009-II: income tax = Union
Corporation Tax	UNION: exclusive	Entry 85, Union List (List I)	NDA 2009-II: corporation tax = Union (distractor as “State”)
Customs Duty (imports and exports)	UNION: exclusive	Entry 83, Union List (List I)	NDA 2009-II: customs duty = Union (distractor as “State”)
Central Excise Duty (on manufactured goods)	UNION: exclusive (mostly subsumed into GST)	Entry 84, Union List (List I)	Cross-reference: GST transition
Sales Tax (intra-State goods)	STATE: exclusive (substantially replaced by GST for most goods)	Entry 54, State List (List II)	NDA 2009-II: sales tax = State EXCLUSIVE: correct answer
Agricultural Income Tax	STATE: exclusive	Entry 46, State List (List II)	Distinguishes from income tax (Union): agricultural income = State
Land Revenue	STATE: exclusive	Entry 45, State List (List II)	State fiscal resource; complements agriculture entry
GST (Goods and Services Tax)	CONCURRENT: both Parliament (CGST) and States (SGST) levy	Article 246A: inserted by 101st Constitutional Amendment, 2016	New concurrent field; future NDA question probability: High

★ IMPORTANT  NDA 2009-II: Which is exclusively State? Answer: Sales Tax. Corporation Tax, Customs Duty, and Income Tax are all UNION taxes. Agricultural Income Tax and Land Revenue are also State taxes but were not tested. Know: Income Tax ≠ State; Customs Duty ≠ State; Corporation Tax ≠ State.  [NDA 2009-II]

GST: Cooperative Fiscal Federalism

The 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2016 was the most significant change to India’s fiscal federalism since 1950. It inserted Article 246A GST gives both Parliament and State Legislatures concurrent power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax (GST). This created a new concurrent legislative field that previously did not exist in the Seventh Schedule.

The GST Council (Article 279A) is the constitutionally created federal body that determines GST rates and policies. It consists of: the Union Finance Minister (as Chairperson), the Union Minister of State for Finance, and the Finance Ministers of all States. Each State has one vote; the Centre has one-third of the total votes weighted; and decisions require a three-fourths majority. The GST Council is a model of cooperative federalism This represents Union and States making decisions together on a shared tax.

GST = concurrent power under Article 246A (101st Amendment, 2016). GST Council = constitutional body under Article 279A. CGST = Union’s share; SGST = State’s share; IGST = interstate transactions (Union levies and distributes). The GST restructured fiscal federalism and is a high-probability future NDA topic.

Part 6: Characteristics of a Federal System

What makes a system federal? Federalism is not about any particular policy or procedure. It is a structural constitutional principle about how powers are divided between levels of government. Understanding what federalism is (and what it is NOT) requires separating it clearly from other constitutional concepts.

IS a Characteristic of Federalism	Is NOT a Characteristic of Federalism
Two distinct levels of government coexisting with distributed powers: Union Government and State Governments, each constitutionally authorised to govern within their respective spheres  [NDA 2011-II]	Absence of separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches: this is a feature of PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY, not federalism. A country can be federal with EITHER a parliamentary system OR a presidential system.  [NDA 2014-I]
Written Constitution specifying, distributing, and protecting the division of powers between levels: without a written Constitution, the division would be subject to unilateral change  [NDA 2011-II]	Centralised administration with a single level of government: this is a UNITARY feature, the opposite of federalism
Independent Supreme Court (or equivalent) entrusted with interpreting the Constitution and arbitrating federal disputes between levels  [NDA 2014-I]	Single citizenship (though India has single citizenship, this is a UNITARY feature, not a federal one)
Supremacy of the Constitution over all governmental action: neither the Union nor States can exceed their constitutional powers	Appointment of Governors by the Centre (in India, this is a UNITARY feature: in classical federal systems, Governors/States have self-selection)
Distribution of legislative, executive, and financial powers between the two levels of government through a constitutional document	Emergency provisions allowing Centre to govern States (in India, Articles 352, 356, 360: these are UNITARY features within a federal framework)

★ IMPORTANT  NDA 2014-I: “No separation of powers between legislature and executive” = NOT a federal characteristic. This is a parliamentary democracy feature. India has no strict separation between PM/Cabinet and Parliament: but this is because India is a parliamentary democracy, not because it is federal. The two concepts operate on completely different axes.  [NDA 2014-I]

Federalism vs Separation of Powers: Two Different Axes

Dimension	Federalism	Separation of Powers
Concept	Vertical distribution of power between levels of government	Horizontal distribution of power within a single level of government
Axis	VERTICAL: Centre ↔ States (Federal Government ↔ Provincial Governments)	HORIZONTAL: Legislature ↔ Executive ↔ Judiciary
What it addresses	Who governs: which level of government makes which decisions?	How governments are organised: who makes laws, who implements them, who interprets them?
Example in India	Parliament vs State Legislatures on the Seventh Schedule lists	Parliament (legislature) vs Cabinet/PM (executive) vs Supreme Court (judiciary)
Parliamentary democracy connection	A country can be federal with a parliamentary OR a presidential system	Parliamentary democracy = no strict separation between legislature and executive (PM comes from Parliament). Presidential democracy = strict separation.
NDA trap	NDA 2014-I: “Absence of separation of powers between legislature and executive” appeared in a FEDERALISM question: students who confuse the two axes choose it as a federal characteristic when it is not	—

Exam Recall Article/Schedule: Seventh Schedule; Articles 245–248 Theme: Federalism Characteristics Key Facts: Federal features: two governments + distribution of powers  [NDA 2011-II] | Written Constitution | Independent judiciary | Constitutional supremacy | NOT federal: absence of separation of powers between legislature and executive  [NDA 2014-I] | Both two governments AND written Constitution = correct  [NDA 2011-II] NDA Trap: NDA 2014-I: “No separation of powers between legislature and executive” = the NOT correct federal characteristic. It is a parliamentary system feature, not a federal feature.

Part 7: Parliament’s Five Exceptional Powers over State List

Can Parliament ever legislate on State List subjects? In normal constitutional conditions, the State Legislature has exclusive power over State List subjects. Parliament cannot make laws on “Public Health” or “Agriculture” in the absence of special circumstances. But five constitutional mechanisms allow Parliament to legislate on State List subjects in exceptional circumstances: each reflecting a different type of national necessity.

Article	Condition	Scope	Duration	Cross-Reference
249	Rajya Sabha passes resolution by 2/3rds of members present and voting declaring it expedient in national interest	Parliament can legislate on specified State List subject	Resolution valid for 1 year; can be renewed for another year at a time	P7 (Rajya Sabha special powers)
250	National Emergency (Article 352) is in operation	Parliament can make laws for the whole country on any State List subject	For duration of Emergency + 6 months after it ceases	P13 (Emergency Provisions)
252	Legislatures of two or more States pass resolutions requesting Parliament to legislate	Parliament may make laws; law extends to requesting States only; other States may adopt by resolution	Until Parliament repeals; requesting States cannot repeal unilaterally	P9 (State Government)
253	International treaty, agreement, or convention requires legislation	Parliament can make laws to implement the treaty regardless of State List placement	Until Parliament repeals	P8 (Union Executive: treaty powers)
356	President’s Rule imposed in a State	Parliament exercises State Legislative powers during President’s Rule	Duration of President’s Rule + 6 months	P9 (State Government); P13 (Emergency)

💡 Parliament’s five exceptions to the normal State List exclusivity form an important syllabus cluster not yet directly tested by NDA (as of 2025). Article 249 (Rajya Sabha resolution) was tested in P7; the other four are untested: high-probability future NDA topics.

Part 8: Administrative Relations: Constitutional Coordination

How do the Union and States work together after laws are made? Making laws is one thing; implementing them is another. A parliamentary law must be executed: and execution often falls on State government machinery even when the law is a Union law. Articles 256–263 govern how this administrative relationship works: as constitutional coordination, not central domination.

Article	Provision
256	Executive power of every State shall be exercised in compliance with Union laws. The Union may give directions to States in this regard. This ensures that Union laws are not frustrated by State inaction.
257	States shall not impede the exercise of the executive power of the Union. The Centre can give directions to States to prevent such impediment.
258	Parliament can confer powers and impose duties on State officers for Union purposes, or authorise the Centre to do so. This allows Union functions to be executed through State administrative machinery without creating parallel Union bureaucracy.
261	Full faith and credit shall be given throughout India to public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every State and of the Union. A judgment obtained in one State’s court can be executed in another State.
263	Inter-State Council: the President may establish an Inter-State Council for coordinating between States and between States and the Union on matters of common interest. (Distinguished from Finance Commission (Article 280): see P11.)

★ IMPORTANT  Article 263 (Inter-State Council) was tested as a WRONG article for Finance Commission in NDA 2024-I (covered in P11). Article 263 = coordination between States and Union. Article 280 = Finance Commission (tax distribution). Both deal with Centre-State relations: the distinction is function (coordination vs fiscal distribution).

All India Services: A Unitary Feature Within Federalism

The All India Services (IAS, IPS, IFS) are a structural feature of India’s administrative federalism. These services are recruited and trained by the Union but serve both Union and State Governments. Article 312 empowers the Rajya Sabha to create new All India Services by a resolution passed by two-thirds of members present and voting if it is declared necessary in the national interest.

The dual control of All India Services officers: recruited centrally, deployed in State cadres: is one of India’s unitary features within the federal framework. An IAS officer serving as a State’s Chief Secretary is governed by State Government for posting purposes but by the Union for service conditions, disciplinary matters, and the cadre allotment system.

Part 9: Financial Relations: Fiscal Federalism

How does the Constitution ensure that States have enough financial resources? Federalism requires that each level of government has adequate financial resources to carry out its constitutional responsibilities. In India, the reality is that the Union collects most of the major taxes while States bear many of the most expensive expenditure responsibilities. This structural imbalance requires a constitutional mechanism for distributing financial resources.

Article	Financial Provision
269	Taxes levied and collected by the Union but assigned to States: these are constitutionally dedicated to States including certain stamp duties.
270	Taxes levied and collected by Union and distributed between Union and States: the principal mechanism through which Union tax revenues are shared with States. The Finance Commission (Article 280) determines the States’ share.
275	Grants-in-aid from the Consolidated Fund of India to States: Parliament may make grants to States that need assistance. Finance Commission recommends the amount.
280	Finance Commission: constituted by President every five years; recommends distribution of tax revenues; recommends grants-in-aid. (Constitutional body covered in P11.) Finance Commission = Article 280; Inter-State Council = Article 263.

💡 Finance Commission (Article 280) distributes what States are owed constitutionally. Grants-in-aid (Article 275) are discretionary assistance. GST (Article 246A, 101st Amendment) created a new concurrent taxation field. The three mechanisms together constitute India’s fiscal federalism architecture.

Part 10: Federal or Unitary? The Constitutional Verdict

Is India a federal state or a unitary state? The answer is: neither purely. India has a carefully crafted constitutional design that combines federal features for normal governance with unitary features that come into play when national unity or emergency requires.

Federal Features of India	Unitary Features of India
Written Constitution: the Seventh Schedule divides powers in a constitutionally protected document	Single Citizenship: India has only one citizenship, Indian citizenship, not dual (Union + State) citizenship
Dual Government: two levels of government function simultaneously, Union and States	Governor appointed by President: unlike classical federations where State heads are elected, India’s Governor is a presidential appointee
Seventh Schedule: three lists distribute legislative powers	Residuary Powers in Parliament (Article 248): unlisted subjects go to Parliament, not States, the opposite of classical federalism
Independent Judiciary: Supreme Court adjudicates Union-State disputes; its decisions bind both levels	All India Services: IAS, IPS, IFS recruited centrally; serve both Union and States; Union controls service conditions
Supremacy of Constitution: neither Union nor States can exceed their constitutional powers; courts can strike down ultra vires legislation	Emergency Provisions (Articles 352, 356, 360): Centre can govern States during emergencies; Parliament can legislate on State List; federal balance is suspended
Finance Commission: constituted periodically to ensure fiscal federalism through independent revenue distribution	Parliament can amend Constitution without State consent in most cases (Article 368; only specific federal provisions require State ratification)

★ IMPORTANT  Constitutional verdict: India is best described as “a Union with a federal structure and a unitary bias,” not a pure federation (like USA or Australia) and not a pure unitary state (like France). The unitary bias explains why India has survived as one nation despite enormous diversity.  [NDA 2010-I | 2014-I]

The constitutional description in Article 1: “Union of States”: captures this balance precisely. The word “Union” signals that the Indian Union is *indestructible* (no State can secede) and that the Centre has ultimate authority in national crises. The word “States” signals that the units of the Union have genuine constitutional autonomy, not merely administrative convenience.

Part 11: Federalism During Emergencies

Does federalism remain unchanged during emergencies? The constitutional answer is no, and this distinction is precisely what NDA 2010-I tested. Emergency provisions create temporary centralisation The federal balance shifts dramatically toward the Centre, but this shift is constitutionally authorised and temporary.

Dimension	Normal Federal Functioning	During Emergency (National or State)
Legislative powers	Three-list division operates; Parliament on Union + Concurrent; States on State List	National Emergency (Art. 352): Parliament can legislate on State List for all States. President’s Rule (Art. 356): Parliament assumes State Legislature’s powers for that State
Executive powers	State Government exercises executive power independently in its domain	President’s Rule (Art. 356): Centre governs State through Governor; State government dissolved or suspended
Federal character	Two levels of government function simultaneously within constitutional spheres	Emergency = temporary suspension of federal balance; country operates as effectively unitary during Emergency
Constitution’s role	Federal division is constitutionally protected	Emergency provisions ARE part of the Constitution: the suspension of federalism during emergencies is constitutionally authorised
Duration	Permanent constitutional arrangement	Temporary: Emergency ceases when conditions change; federal balance automatically restored

★ IMPORTANT  NDA 2010-I: “President takes over State administration under emergency provisions” = VIOLATES federal principle. “Parliament has exclusive residuary power” = does NOT violate federal principle. “Three-list distribution” = does NOT violate federal principle. Answer = (b) 2 and 3 only.  [NDA 2010-I]

The constitutional distinction is important: emergency provisions are not a failure of federalism Emergency provisions are a constitutionally designed safety valve. The Constituent Assembly included them because they understood that rigid federalism during a genuine national emergency could be catastrophic. But the temporary suspension of federalism during an emergency does not mean India is not a federal state: it means India is a *pragmatic federal state* that reserves the right to centralise in extremis.

---